<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Influencing Tastes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2009/11/influencing-tastes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2009/11/influencing-tastes/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a Kitchen Chemist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jbx</title>
		<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2009/11/influencing-tastes/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>jbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theweeklybrew.com/?p=1272#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>You suggested a taste PREESNT and another taster found it.
A valid detection.

Try suggesting a plausible taste NOT PRESENT and record the result of other taster.  A NOT PRESENT taste found is, of course, a false positive. 

Try the test a number of times [say 10 independent sample events].

Report the result.  

Of course, you might be labeled &#039;the Chicken Little&#039; of beer notes not found.

Have other people test you with TRUE and FALSE taste present.
Record the results; report the results after a significant number of of test.

Or fall back to the binary taste test report
1 = this beer is awesome
0 = this beer sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You suggested a taste PREESNT and another taster found it.<br />
A valid detection.</p>
<p>Try suggesting a plausible taste NOT PRESENT and record the result of other taster.  A NOT PRESENT taste found is, of course, a false positive. </p>
<p>Try the test a number of times [say 10 independent sample events].</p>
<p>Report the result.  </p>
<p>Of course, you might be labeled &#8216;the Chicken Little&#8217; of beer notes not found.</p>
<p>Have other people test you with TRUE and FALSE taste present.<br />
Record the results; report the results after a significant number of of test.</p>
<p>Or fall back to the binary taste test report<br />
1 = this beer is awesome<br />
0 = this beer sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beermented</title>
		<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2009/11/influencing-tastes/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Beermented</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theweeklybrew.com/?p=1272#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Wha? Did you say something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wha? Did you say something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
