<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bah Humbug!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2010/01/bah-humbug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2010/01/bah-humbug/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a Kitchen Chemist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Taps</title>
		<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2010/01/bah-humbug/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital Taps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theweeklybrew.com/?p=1359#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>What about McEwan&#039;s?  Beeradvocate, for example, &lt;a href=&quot;http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/342/1275/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;calls it&lt;/a&gt; a &quot;scotch ale / wee heavy,&quot; and at 8% abv, it seems to me it&#039;s entirely comparable to Old Humbug.  More than this, it has the same toffee and sweet.  Moylan&#039;s Kilt Lifter and Rush River Winter Warmer invoke both categories as well.

While I respect that Keelhauler wasn&#039;t to your taste, I must disagree that scotch ales and winter warmers are so easily distinguished!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about McEwan&#8217;s?  Beeradvocate, for example, <a href="http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/342/1275/" rel="nofollow">calls it</a> a &#8220;scotch ale / wee heavy,&#8221; and at 8% abv, it seems to me it&#8217;s entirely comparable to Old Humbug.  More than this, it has the same toffee and sweet.  Moylan&#8217;s Kilt Lifter and Rush River Winter Warmer invoke both categories as well.</p>
<p>While I respect that Keelhauler wasn&#8217;t to your taste, I must disagree that scotch ales and winter warmers are so easily distinguished!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2010/01/bah-humbug/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theweeklybrew.com/?p=1359#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the two can, or should, compare. Old Humbug is a winter warmer with alot going on. As it warms it gets extremely nutty. Keelhauler though is a scottish ale and not my favorite. A sweeter toffee taste is common in winter warmers and on style. A scotish ale on the other hand should be less sweet, and be balanced by a carmalized flavor.


While on scotish ales.... Have you tried Smoking Bagpipes?? It&#039;s on tap at Venti&#039;s right now. The smoke is a bit intense and overwhelming at first, but after your palate learns to move beyond it it&#039;s not a bad scotish ale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the two can, or should, compare. Old Humbug is a winter warmer with alot going on. As it warms it gets extremely nutty. Keelhauler though is a scottish ale and not my favorite. A sweeter toffee taste is common in winter warmers and on style. A scotish ale on the other hand should be less sweet, and be balanced by a carmalized flavor.</p>
<p>While on scotish ales&#8230;. Have you tried Smoking Bagpipes?? It&#8217;s on tap at Venti&#8217;s right now. The smoke is a bit intense and overwhelming at first, but after your palate learns to move beyond it it&#8217;s not a bad scotish ale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Taps</title>
		<link>http://www.theweeklybrew.com/2010/01/bah-humbug/comment-page-1/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital Taps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theweeklybrew.com/?p=1359#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>Did you have Keelhauler when it came out?  I liked its take on the Scotch Ale better than this one - which had for me entirely too much toffee &amp; sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have Keelhauler when it came out?  I liked its take on the Scotch Ale better than this one &#8211; which had for me entirely too much toffee &amp; sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

