Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

Memorial Day and Beer

Monday, May 25th, 2009

americanflag01

Memorial Day is the second biggest holiday in terms of beer sales in the United States. For many people it means a three day weekend full of camping and BBQ’s, many breweries also have sales/tastings around memorial day. While I’m all for good beer and good times, I can’t help but wonder if craft beer should be taking advantage of this holiday. Sure brewers weren’t the ones that took a patriotic holiday and morphed it into a party, and sure macro brewers have been taking advantage of it for years. But isn’t the philosophy of craft beer about being different? Being better?

Memorial Day was founded as a day of remembrance in the north to honor those slain in the Civil War, with the  south choosing to honor their dead on separate days. When memorial day became about honoring all Americas slain though the government set a date for the whole nation to honor those who died for our country. Over the years though memorial day has morphed for many into a day of play lived out in a beery haze. By craft brewers encouraging people to spend their memorial day having fun in a buzzed state how are we honoring our dead?

I say the craft beer industry should stand up. It should show what it;s made of, and that it can be different. That craft beer is the unique industry that it claims to be, and not just gourmet beer for people with money. Let’s reclaim our holiday! I understand not everyone can, or has the desire too, go to a grave site and place flowers. So instead let’s honor the dead as drinkers honor everything. At 3pm Pacific time join me in taking a break from the fun, and take a second to remember our fallen heroes and toast to their honor. Because today isn’t a holiday for beer, BBQ’s, and boating. Today is a holiday for America.

Falling In Love With A Comment

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Back on the 6th my blog, and some other blogs I read were twitted in part because of our responses to the I Am A Craft Brewer vid on Vimeo. This led to an avalanche of comments on all these blogs, and some were more interesting then others. One in particular had an effect on me, and it takes alot for someones words to stir me into a Passion. It was submitted by David Berg of August Schell brewing. Strangely it was meant for the blog of a lady named Maureen who happened to be on the Beer Wars panel (she was the infamous El Guapo who said “see me in ten years”). It couldn’t have fallen in better hands though as he accidentally posted it at Jeff Alworths blog Beervana. Jeff has written a bit on this quandary facing the brewers association (here and here, oh yeah, and he talks about Widmer getting kicked from “craft beer” here) to see Jeff’s post on David’s comment click here.

Without anything further on my part here is what David wrote.

Hey Maureen-

“I was a craft brewer.” That’s the movie I want to make. Because, I was at one time, according to the BA and the video. But alas, I work for August Schell now, and we are not craft brewers (just ask the BA). Never mind the fact that we will celebrate our 150th year in 2010 as the second-oldest family owned brewery in the US. We survived prohibition, a Native American uprising that burned New Ulm to the ground, and the vanishing of regional breweries in the 70′s and 80′s. Forget the fact that we sold a tree on our grounds in the 80′s to pay the bills. Discount that we brewed a German Pilsner and Weizen in 1986.

Because, the fact is, the bulk of our production uses corn as an adjunct. And even if you discount that beer, we would still produce a larger volume of non-adjunct beers than most of the top craft breweries. But hey, what does that matter?

No, I am not a craft brewer, and I’ll happily be that for another 150 years.

Cheers!

David Berg
August Schell Brewing

 

Cheers David

When Seasonals Should Be Standards

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Yesterday Greg Koch stopped by my blog and it has fried my brain in terms of writing. For those who don’t know me I like to poke, but abhore confrontation. So yesterday was a tense day. Not only that, but many blogs that I posted comments on in the morning were visited by him and his followers also. So even my comments that weren’t anti Greg Koch began to look like it to me. So while I’d like to write a reaction to yesterday, I’m going to refrain. I’m picking a nice safe topic that can’t get me in trouble.

untitled

Last night I picked up a bottle of seasonal beer from Ninkasi which is fast becoming my favorite seasonal brewer. Sadly though it looks like my love for them will never move beyond their seasonals. Their main lineup consists of a couple Northwest IPAs and a double red. As a person who isn’t to big into overhopped beers it’s understandable that I’m less then thrilled with their main line. Their Spring Reign, Oatis, and Sleigh’R though are all awesome beers, and count for around half of their lineup.

Why is it that these amazing beers must be relegated to only a few months of the year?

I’ve noticed somewhat of a theme in some Oregon breweries (if it’s only occasionaly is it still a theme?) Breweries will have a few excellent beers available, and then round out their line with multiple over the top IPAs because that’s what sells here. That leaves those of us who don’t like IPAs much up Bitch Creek (joke for Northwestern drinkers). Instead I’m stuck buying Rogue, Deschutes, Widmer, and Anchor to round out the beer fridge and give me a break from homebrew. I guess I could just go out and buy a case of Spring Reign, and I guess I could do the same with Oatis. But doesn’t a case seem over the top for a great beers that on their own could carry your main line?

A Clarification/Reaction/Appology

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

On April 30th I wrote an open letter to Greg Koch in which I accused him of being a “whiny jerk off” amongst other things. I’ll admit I was wrong in writing that letter the way I did. I have never met Greg and do not know what kind of person he is. That day Greg became the focus of all my annoyance with the craft beer industry and the beer snobs that follow it. I was wrong. I thought Greg would never read it and thought my vent would be good for a few laughs and some poking with sticks in his direction. Apparently I thought wrong though as Greg read it and even posted a link to it on his twitter today. While I’m sure Greg is a good guy if you know him personally I still stand by some of what I said and would like to clarify it in an attempt to address some of the comments I’ve received.

Mr Koch,

First off I apologize for the attributes I layered on you. I do not know you personally and had no right to characterize you as such. That being said please understand that the way you present yourself and your brewery is what has caused me to leap to these conclusions. I understand that part of it is simply how you market your beers. After all, I’ve grown up around Rogue who labels themselves as the beer that individualists drink. I get that it gives the product an air of being exclusive. My problem is that products and companies who characterize themselves in this manner annoy me to no end. I also understand that you were using mozzarella sticks and Kenny G in a humorous way, but in my mind that just pointed back to the problem I was trying to address. We’ve allowed and encouraged labels to be attached to craft beer that have made it more about the image then good beer. Also I don’t see how passion has anything to do with whetheror not someone can make a good product. I personally make beers I enjoy. Am I passionate about them? Well, I’m not sure I’d characterize it in that way. I just happen to make what I enjoy and am content with that. In my mind your version of passion conjurs the idea of being narrow minded about your own tastes.

To Everyone Else,

I’m not the Miller drinker I was describing. I have nothing against Miller, I just don’t happen to enjoy their beer. That Miller drinker I described happened to be a combination of two of my friends, both of whom are BMC drinkers. The one that likes Miller also happens to be my favorite drinking buddy. They do enjoy craft beer, but Miller High Life is just something they happen to enjoy more. Also my grandparents are Busch Lite drinkers. I don’t blame this on them being ignorant or dispassionate. They have both tried craft beer and usually try whatever homebrew I have and still prefer their Busch. They just happen to have different tastes. I don’t see how this makes them ignorant or dispassionate. The fact that I got comments about people being surprised that the person I described didn’t drink craft beer just goes to prove that we have attached ridiculous labels on craft beer drinkers.

Also when I talked about diversity I wasn’t refering to beer selection, but referring to the people that frequent craft beer pubs in Salem. Although I would rather go to these places and have a good local beer I find myself more often at local watering holes that serve BMC simply because the crowds are more diverse, and more fun IMHO. I’d rather kick back and relax without having to hear about Indy music, local foodie hotspots, and all those other silly things. I feel that craft beer has allowed itself to become so exclusive and snobbish that it is ridiculous. I still stand by my challenge to Greg and the rest of you. Rather then criticize others for their beer tastes buy them a Bud and have a conversation. Who knows, you may find a great friend, albeit one who drinks BMC.

Mr. Koch, Please Shut UP

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

There are two famous Koch’s in the brewing world, neither related, and both are the most whiny jerk offs in the brewing industry. Today’s post is dedicated to just one of the though, Greg Koch of Stone Brewing. He has annoyed me to the point that I’m writing this open letter that I will never send.

untitled

Dear Mr. Greg “it’s Bud’s fault” Koch

Over the last couple months your name has been pinging all over the radar, and I think it’s gone to your head. You seem to be espousing this view that craft brewers are the schiz, and anyone who doesn’t think so has obviously had a lobotomy. I find this view offensive, silly, and just plain high school cliquish. Please allow me to explain.

Prior to the expansion of your head I only knew you as the CEO of Stone. A brewery that made good beer, but thought much more of itself then most people I know thought of them. Then shortly before Beer Wars was released your name started popping up everywhere, and it was no longer attached to Stone all the time. You were your own person, Greg Koch and not Greg Koch of Stone Brewing. This was no big deal to me as you were an important member of the panel who was there to give a poorly made Micheal Moore style documentary some street cred. But anyone with even a peanut size brain could see that the only thing that movie was made to do was trash everyone except micro brewers, and talk about how great people like you are.

My opinion of you didn’t drop after the movie since that was obviously the direction it was headed. I would have prefered if you tried to bring some level headed discussion to the panel, but I can’t get everything. Then you gave your speech at the Craft Brewers Conference in Boston and shot yourself in the foot. You characterized the people who drink BMC as “dispassionate consumers”, “Wusses”, and said that people who enjoy “fizzy yellow beer” are the kind of people who like mozzarella sticks, white bread, instant coffee, and Kenny G. Really Greg? Do you really think less of someone because they don’t eat gourmet food, drink craft beer, patronize Starbucks, or listen to Count Basie. It takes either a brave man, or a small man to judge a person based on their tastes and habits of consumption.

Let me characterize someone for you. Picture a person sitting in a local cafe. They have a Mac Book in front of them, an iPod on the table, and designer clothes. This person likes to view themselves as a foodie and only eats at the trendy spots in town. They spend their free time listening to local indie music simply because it’s local, and therefore better then anything else. Is this the kind of passionate person that you want drinking craft beer? If so then that’s interesting because the person I described drinks Miller High Life. They won’t touch white bread, instant coffee or listen to Kenny G. But what does what they drink, wear, or eat have to do with what kind of person they are? Why should a pub owner aim for what you call the “passionate consumers” that fit your mold and not be welcoming of all good people?

I’m tired of pubs that cater to your mold. I wish someday to see more pubs with the same diversity you see at the local bar. The way you guys have marketed yourselves is hurting the craft beer industry, but you like the trendy people with money to burn on $5 pints and $3 dollar bombers. Why should someone as passionate as Greg Koch market his beer towards Joe Schmoe? No wonder many blue collar people view craft beer as a white collar drink and prefer to stick to BMC. The big brands are all to happy to tell them we like you the way you are, why should you have to change.

Hopefully brewers like you will wake up one day and realize that not everyone who doesn’t fit your mold is a stupid person unworthy of your time. Hopefully one day you guys will let the consumer decide what they want to drink without getting on your soapbox to tell them they are wrong. Hopefully one day you really will make beer simply because it’s your passion like you say, and not because you have to stick it to the man and those dispassionate consumers. I dare you to walk into a pub and buy a round of Bud for all those “fizzy yellow beer drinkers”.

The Coolest Beer Related Email

Friday, April 24th, 2009

Yesterday morning I awoke to both the most exciting, and the most  annoying beer related email I’ve received.

OREGON GARDENS 2009 HOMEBREWERS CLASSIC‏
From:  Richard Blankenship
Sent: Thu 4/23/09 8:53 AM
 
Congratulations on placing in the 2009 Oregon Gardens Homebrewers Classic. 
 
The awards ceremony will take place this Saturday, April 25th at 1:00 P.M.  We hope you can attend.
 
Slainte’
Dick Blankenship
Capitol Brewers
Entry Coordinator

Why 3 Tier Doesn’t Work Properly

Monday, April 20th, 2009

unbalancedI planned on getting this up this morning, but the sun is out today so I decided to go play on my bike instead, and just upload later.

On Saturday I wrote about how the 3 tier system is built and supposed to function. But as Robert Burns said, “The best laid plans of mice and men, oft go awry.”

The beauty of the 3 tier system is it’s transparency. It’s supposed to eliminate the shady area between the brewer and the retailer by breaking it into basic steps. The problem arises when one of the 3 tiers gains power over the other two. When this happens we’re back to the same corruption we wanted to eliminate.

Back in the days of the big brewers this situation wasn’t as common. If you distributed on a national level you only carried the big beers. Local beers were generally carried by local distributors. The problem is the market has changed, alot. Now there are constantly new beers trying to get shelf space nationally. One thing you often encounter though is that distributors want to carry beers that are easy sales, not necessarily great beers. To compete with this alot of smaller brewers went through smaller distributors. This increased competition between brewers. Another issue is that the distribution networks for the big brewers want to keep their clients happy.

The later issue of keeping BMC happy is one of the interesting ones. Back in the early days of the craft brew industry the big brewers came up with a solution for shutting the little guys out. Since exclusivity contracts where a brewer dictated what you carried were not aloud they decided to offer incentives to distributors that shut the little guys out. This was shady, but perfectly legal, and could have worked. The problem was that as people became interested in craft beer, and public opinion turned against the BMC’s, distributors began to opt out in order to cash in on craft beer. To cope with this the big guys came up with another solution. If you allowed them a decent stake in your company then you got access to their distribution networks. Distributors liked this because they got the perks from the big guys, and they still got to sell craft beer. The problem is now the incentive for distributors to carry the new guys is lessened.

Another issue is what if you have a brew pub? Well according to the 3 tier you have to pay a distributor to legally move your beer from your brew house to the bar. Seem wrong to you too? To overcome this some states have laws that allow brewers to self distribute. The problem comes about when you have a brewery that operates their own pubs. Let’s enter the land of theory real quick. Here in Oregon we have a chain called McMenamin’s. McMenamin’s brewery is located in Portland, but they have breweries and local bars all over Oregon. Now with a self distribute law they could theoretically move beer to all their bars without once paying a distributor. This allows them to sell their beer cheaper at a higher profit. Now what happens to the little guy that wants to get into local bars? He has to go through a distributor while the pub chain doesn’t have to. This raises the price of his beer. Now the local bars that his beer goes to have to compete with a pub that can offer cheaper beer. It is very difficult to preserve the simplicity of the 3 tier system while trying to keep it fair. The more fair it is, the less transparent it becomes.

Remember at the beginning where I alluded that the distributors have power over breweries and retailers? Well here’s where that comes in. While there are laws that prevent distributors from offering incentives to bars this doesn’t always happen. Some distributors have started offering bars things like extra tap lines if the bars will use them as their distributor. While this is illegal it’s sometimes overlooked. This can hurt competition among distributors. Also it doesn’t take imagination to see where distributors who favor breweries can help hamper the competition. This makes distributors some of the most powerful entities in the beer industry. Remember, breweries are required to use distributers.

The biggest issue is one inherent in all things in our country. While the free market isn’t bad when it’s combined with the 3 tier system it makes a difficult situation for brewers. Distributors will inherently carry, and buy more of a beer that sells easy. This is where the selection issueI talked about comes in. With only so much space available for retail distributors won’t be as willing to push your new breweries product while they are carrying known sellers.

This system creates a market that isn’t always friendly to the little guy. So how can the system be improved? Let’s hear some ideas. Should we break it down into more tiers? Less tiers? Get rid of the tiers? Give me some feedback, because I still haven’t thought up a system that’s fair to everyone, and I’m beginning to think it’s impossible.

Three Tier Distribution Is Bad?

Saturday, April 18th, 2009
Image borrowed without permission from Fermentarium

Image borrowed without permission from Fermentarium

With the recent release of “Beer Wars” there seems to be a lot of junk floating around out there about the three tiered distribution system. First off I haven’t seen “Beer Wars”, and I have no desire to see it. Secondly I am not a brewer, distributor, or retailer. So realize that when I talk about the system I’m neither commenting on Beer Wars, nor talking from experience as one of the three tiers. I’m just a lowly consumer who’s spent the day combing through complaints (mostly on wine forums) and doing research on it.

So what is a three tier system and how does it work? The current system comes out of the haydays of alcohol prior to prohibition. Now allot of micro brew enthusiasts will rail on about how great it must have been back in the day when every community had their own brewery. The problem with this is it isn’t true. Well not in the sense that the facts are wrong, but in the sense that it misrepresents the way things were then. The truth was while lack of refrigeration limited the reach of breweries, it didn’t make this utopia situation where the little guy thrived. I won’t get into that except where it has to do with distribution. I will stay focused! Anyway, back then breweries distributed their own beer. Makes sense right? I make my beer, then sell it to the bar, and the bar sells it to you. What could go wrong?

Well alot went wrong. Most people think that people who made alcoholic beverages didn’t really start getting into strong arm tactics until prohibition, but they did, long before. One way breweries did this is similar to the way coal mines operated long ago. In a coal mine you used to rent your home from the company. You also bought all your tools and food, regardless of price, from the company. This was because company money was only good at the company store. Well if you wanted to open a bar or pub back then you went to the brewery. The brewery would help you finance the bar (furniture and the works), and give you beer to sell. In exchange you only sold that breweries beer, and the brewery had control over your bar. You didn’t want to sell the breweries beer then that was fine, they owned the loan on the bar, and you would be replaced. Also in order to retain control of your bar you had to keep the brewery happy. This meant that your sales were supposed to go up, up, and up some more. In order to remain in compitition and increase growth bars had to get your butt in the bar, and they had to get you to drink more, and more beer. Considering this fact, and the overindulgence in alcohol that resulted, it’s not hard to see why many Americans supported temperance. In fact before prohibition many states had decided to dry up on their own because of issues with alcoholism in their communities.

After the 21st amendment was passed to repeal the 18th the ATF went from a police force, to revenue collecting for the government. In order to make it easier to collect taxes, and in order to prevent the abuses that occurred before, they came up with the three tier system. This now meant that the brewery had to sell their beer to a middle man who then sold it to bars, restaurants, and markets. The distributor would also pay the taxes on said beer after purchasing it from the brewery. Another rule was that distributors wouldn’t pimp merchandise from one particular company like the old days. The brewers would pay for all products that were used to get a beer in the hands of a retailer (like samples) and the distributor would only be in charge of shipment. This prevented the person who sold you beer from being able to decide how you run your establishment, or provide incentives for you to carry certain beers.

So under our current system the retailer buys beers from several breweries, then the distributor pays taxes on the beer. Next the distributor goes out and finds establishments that will carry the beer using promotional material payed for by the brewery. The distributor then sells the beer with a mark up to the retailer. The retailer then uses the promotional material that either they bought from the brewery, or were given by the brewery in order to get you to buy the beer at yet another mark up. Did that make sense? Good, because that’s the way it should look in a perfect world. In reality it doesn’t work quite that way, which makes things even messier.  I’ll get around to explaining why this doesn’t work around Monday hopefully since that’s also another lengthy post.

Being Honest About An Honest Pint

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

large_honestpintI hadn’t weighed in on this issue despite the news coverage it’s gotten simply because it’s been covered fairly well already. The problem is most of the coverage has been positive.

Back when I found Jeff Alworth  had started an “Honest Pint Project” at beervana I was strongly in favor of it. Jeff had an idea whereby bars would be encouraged to serve an honest 16oz pint thanks to a locally supported project. As I understood it bars, teverns, pubs, and breweries could sign up, show they were honest, and receive a sticker and some promotion by joining. Then all the local beer drinkers would know that these places with a sticker supported the locals by giving them what they paid for. Somewhere along the line though this was turned into a political issue and now I hate it.

Jules Bailey from Portland apparently awoke one day and realized this could help his political career. After all, why else would a lawmaker take a local cause, turn it into a law, and not even add penalties for people violating the law? Lawmaker after lawmaker gave touching comments about protecting the consumer. So what does this law entail that makes it better then Jeff’s community project? Well first it passes a law saying people can voluntarily serve you a full 16oz pint, but they don’t have to. If you want to obey the new law then the (overburdened as the Oregonian put it) OLCC will come out and check your glasses and, if you pass muster, give you a neat sticker to put on your door or window. So how is this bill any different from the initial “Honest Pint Project”? Well it’s different because instead of it being supported by the beer drinkers and bars themselves it will be funded by you the taxpayer, weather you drink or not.

Is this really something Oregon should be discussing in any economic climate, let alone one where everyone is claiming they don’t have enough funding? Is missing 2oz out of your glass really worth passing a law over? For crying out loud people the law is voluntary. If the bar you’re currently going too wants to use cheater pints they will. Will anyone out there honestly stop patronizing a bar without a sticker? While we’re at it why not ask ourselves when the stupidity will end? When bars are certified, but still use cheater pints will we blackball them? Or will we pass a law about that? What about when some smart bar owner makes his own copy of an honest pint sticker and throws it on his window? Will we make a law about that? Will we eventually end up like Europe where they tell you what size of glasses you have to buy?

I hereby ask Jeff Alworth, and everyone who supports their local pubs, to start another community initiative on top of the OLCC’s. Give bar owners an incentive to join with a website or something that will give them publicity and allow them to buy into it. Create a movement that shows Oregonians can get things done without passing a law!

Hopping Out Creativity

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Here’s a post I wrote awhile back but just haven’t gotten up.

Picture borrowed from KalamaBrew

Picture borrowed from KalamaBrew

 

Am I the only one annoyed with all the over hopped beers out lately? It seems like every time I walk down the beer isle there’s a new pale ale out with some weird name meant to convey how hoppy it is. When I got into homebrewing it was because it allowed me to not only make beer I enjoyed drinking for a cheaper price, but it also let me get creative. I love adding strange spices, or weird combinations in order to see where it takes the beer. Now it seems to be the only way to get a beer not overloaded with hop bitterness, or hop flavors.

 I understand some people are just hop heads, and they enjoy these beers. What are the rest of us supposed to drink though? Sure I can get my regular sixer of Anchor Steam, or grab a bomber of Oatis. But part of me wants to feel the excitement of constantly trying new beers in my favorite styles. In fact if it wasn’t for my new found enjoyment of wheat beer I don’t think I would have tried much in the way new beers this last few months. Even some of the winter seasonals I tried were on the hoppy side this year, which is unusual.

 Another thing that bothers me are the hop gimmicks. Take Sierra Nevadas hop torpedo. Essentialy they created a french press for beer. But instead of using coffee, they use hops. This is their new marketing ploy. Somehow they are able to extract infinitely more hop flavors then everyone else because they dry hop this way. I say just toss the hops in the brite tank and let them sit a little longer. Or what about the “we hop our beer x amount of times, which is x amount more then others.” Any homebrewer knows that hopping is about utilizing the essential oils and alpha acids, and that the hoping schedule is meant to extract a certain amount of bitterness and/or flavor from the hop. So why would more then five hop editions make beer better?

 What they fail to mention is that the first four or five editions are fairly standard. I do around three with my homebrew. The hop additions outside that are usually layering different hop flavors. Do they really make the beer better? Well they do if you like that stuff. They certainly make the beer more costly to make. It’s up to you if you think the price of the beer improves the flavor.

Hops allow brewers a greater range of freedom with their beer since there are infinite ways to layer their flavors. This is an awesome thing. The problem is it seems most brewers are stuck on hop experimentation. I’d love to see more gruits, or beers with experimental spices. What about a beer that experiments with the malt to a radical degree like their doing with hops? I’m all for experimentation, would just like to see more of it in other categories.